Showing posts with label distance education. Show all posts
Showing posts with label distance education. Show all posts

Monday, February 14, 2011

Adobe - The Chronicle of Higher Education

Quoted from http://chronicle.com/section/Adobe/476/:

Adobe - The Chronicle of Higher Education

Teach, learn, and collaborate from any distance, at any time, with integrated technology that's easy to use and access. From campuswide efficiencies to extending the classroom across the globe, a successful implementation of Adobe eLearning and Collaboration technologies provides a powerful platform for distributed learning and reducing spending and waste. Adobe eLearning solutions combine the best technology with free downloadable guides for extending courses with virtual classrooms, creating reusable online learning content, supporting online meetings, collaborating online, and integrating with your existing Learning Management System (LMS).»Read More

 

Clemson University
Top public university embraces Adobe® Acrobat® Connect™ Pro to enhance the academic experience, further collaboration, and support IT services across departments.» Read More

University of Michigan Medical School
World-class university medical school uses Adobe® Acrobat® Connect™ Pro to enhance student learning and collaboration and bring efficiency to critical research trials.» Read More

Case Western Reserve University
At Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, Ohio, faculty, students and administrators on campus and around the globe have found a way to connect seamlessly, simultaneously and successfully, with Connect.» Read More

Online Learning - The Chronicle of Higher Education

Quoted from http://chronicle.com/section/Online-Learning/471?=2:

Online Learning - The Chronicle of Higher Education

Is Your Online Learning Program Geared for Success?

There’s no denying it – web-enabled classrooms are booming, expected to serve more than 17 million students by 2013. In fact, the Sloan Consortium states that, of...

Wednesday, August 25, 2010

Distance Education: The Centralization vs. Decentralization Debate

Distance Education: The Centralization vs. Decentralization Debate

By Michael T. Eskey, PhD

The debate for “control” of distance education at institutions of higher learning continues. On one side, the administration side, there is a need for centralization of operations, to include course development, instructor training and development, scheduling, evaluation, and student and faculty issues. On the other side of the debate, faculty leaders (deans, department chairs, program coordinators) tend to favor decentralization.

In June 2010, the Western Cooperative for Educational Telecommunication (WCET) asked the membership how institutions were doing with this issue: centralization vs. de-centralization. Twenty-three administrators (provosts, VPs, associate VPs, directors, associate directors, COOs, deans, associate deans) and faculty members provided their valuable insights on the issue.

We are experiencing an era of reduced resources. Those favoring centralization espouse the benefits of both consistent instruction and course development, as well as the avoidance of more resource-consuming stove-piping prevalent if colleges/departments are allowed to develop their own online instructional programs. Those favoring decentralization are convinced that college/departmental control is the best solution for students, faculty, and institutions. The contention of these respondents was that college deans would take on the added responsibilities of their college’s portion of centralized operations of distance learning, faculty development, and learning technologies. A key is to find distance learning champions for each college within an institution. And, that is extremely costly when supporting multiple distance learning organizations versus one.

Both centralization and decentralization of distance learning have advantages and disadvantages; causing many to favor a hybrid approach. The recognition of local control and personal engagement of decentralization must be blended with centralized services that are often more efficient, cost effective, and liberating.

Stay current on the latest distance learning trends with Distance Education Report. Each issue offers practical solutions and best practices to enhance your programs and solve your trickiest problems. Learn More »

Ensuring the same level of service
Technology advancements have brought new opportunities and responsibilities for instructional quality and control. (Fletcher, J., Tobias, S. and Wesher, R) The true responsibility of this lies with the faculty.

When comparing distance learning to face-to-face instruction, a number of important factors emerge, including similarity of student learning experiences, student outcomes, and employer acceptance of credentials. It is important that the instruction provided in both venues be seamless. Centralization ensures that institutions offer services specifically to the online population, while ensuring that they receive the same level of service and instruction that the onsite students receive.

A number of institutions favor decentralization, but do not (or are not willing-to) hold their institutional campus to the same standard and rigor (metrics, support, quality, rubrics, etc.) as their online courses. The ability of college deans in the decentralized modes of administration to be able to discern the differences is the crux of the issue of whether services are better (and more economical) when provided “centrally” instead of by the college or departments.

Michael T. Eskey, PhD is an associate professor of criminal justice at Park University.

References
WCET (October, 2009) Online education programs marked by rising enrollments, unsure profits, organizational transitions, higher fees, & teach training for faculty, Managing Online Education, pp. 1 – 4.

Fletcher, J., Tobias, S. and Wesher, R (2007), Learning anytime, anywhere: Advanced distributed learning and the changing face of education, Educational Research, 36 (2), 96-102.

Friday, April 16, 2010

Distance Ed. links

USEFUL LINKS

Distance Educator >>
Website with tons of information for the distance educator.

DETC >>
The Distance Education and Training Council.

Distance Education >>
The Distance Education section of the Chronicle of Higher Education.

Stanford Learning Lab home page >>
Stanford Learning Lab's team builds the next-generation learning tools and educational services. E-learning innovations. Ongoing projects, theory and practice of the distributed collaborative learning.

Integrated Distance Learning Course >>
Stanford University course for international students in Computer Integrated Architecture, Engineering, and Construction. Effective project-based learning and team approach Pedagogy.

Electronic Learning Community (ELC) >>
The web-pages of the John Hopkins University Center for Technology in Education. A model application for creating secure electronic learning communities (ELC).

Learning Mastery >>
Learning Mastery Services - online activities in three related practice areas: virtual collaboration, collaborative learning networks, and change management. Collaborative learning guidebook, Internet resources, programs' descriptions.

Coalition for Self-Learning >>
The home page of a Coalition for Self-Learning with the link to the e-book "Creating Learning Communities".

The International Council for Open and Distance Education >>
ICDE is a global membership organization of educational institutions, national and regional associations,corporations, educational authorities and agencies in the field of open learning, distance education, and flexible, lifelong learning.

International Centre for Distance Learning >>
ICDL promotes international research and collaboration by providing information from its library and databases.

Online collaborative environment. PanFora. >>
The site of wiTHinc company that develops collaboration software. The panFora advanced integrated online discussion board and document sharing system.

ADEC - American Distance Education Consortium >>
Collection of on-line resources on distance education. Various topics - online resources, ongoing projects, courseware tools, programs, grants, standarts, etc.

About. Distance Learning GuideSite >>
Information Portal with collection of useful links on distance learning.

International Review of research in Open and Distance Learning >>
A refereed electronic journal (at Athabasca University, Canada) to advance theory, research and practice in open and distance learning worldwide.

AcademicInfo: Subject Guides & Online Degrees >>
AcademicInfo is an online education resource center with extensive subject guides and distance learning information. Provides free, independent and accurate information and resources for prospective and current students and other researchers.

Monday, September 7, 2009

Online learning 4: How to teach online

1. Know your students: too busy to attend regular classes, struggling to combine job and family obligations with their studies. From andragogical perspectives, (1) for adult students to learn optimally they need to feel that what they study has relevance to their lives and/or their work; (2) that they know their own learning style and are given opportunities to work with the materials so it fits their way of learning

2. How to become an online professor?
  • Create a professional website
  • Effective communication - concise, responsive
  • Right attitude - easy to work with, open-minded, flexible
  • Well begun is half done
  • Always backup your materials
3. Content
  • content is less important than a well-structured classroom and peer interaction
  • developed by content experts + instructional designers
  • Online forum
  • Keep a log of broken links, inconsistencies, and things to adjust and after thoughts/suggestions
4. Setting up the online classroom
  • one section for each week/unit
  • specific forum sections (for self intro, peer discussion, and current events and questions for the professor) shall be set up completely before the course starts
  • discussion starters & intro messages for each forum section. (plus share info about yourself - encourage them to create a friendly meeting place)
5. Facilitation
  • A shift from objectivist paradigm to constructivist paradigm
  • A shift of power away form the professor to the students
  • Clear expectations & timely feedback
  • too many postings by the professor tends to hamper student interaction
  • create a positive, open, and supportive learning environment
6. Feedback & grading
  • Provide a list of assignments and deadlines (including examples, starting time, etc.)
  • Organize your email and folders
  • Feedback (a general part that discusses aspects of the assignment that pertain to most of the students and what the grading criteria are, and a student-specific part to discuss the strengths of the assignment and what can be improved)
  • Check for plagarism (Google search)
  • Self evaluation
  • Late policy
  • The main traits the students appreciate in a professor is friendliness, warmth, support, and clear expectations!

Sunday, September 6, 2009

Online learning 3: Community, facilitation, and assessment

1. Emerging needs
  • just-in-time knowledge has replaced the just-in-case, longer modules
  • changing roles, expectations, responsibilities of mentors & learners
  • more learner-centered, technology-enhanced communication (across time & space)
2. Interaction
  • peers have a major influence on successful learning outcome, which is often not taken into account when designing training and academic courses (Palloff & Pratt, 1999)
  • Key aspects of online interaction: a. community building, b. knowledge generation, & c. process management (Palloff & Pratt, 1999)
  • a. Create spaces where students have the opportunity to interact about personal matters, build personal relationship and share issues not directly related to the course (reflection: web 2.0 tools such as Facebook and Twitter meet this need by providing profiles of the contact and extensive use of emotioncons to mitigate the challenge of the lack of non-verbal cue)
  • b. Online interaction takes place without place and time restrictions, which is particularly conducive for knowledge generation in a constructive mode - meaning becomes shared through negotiation and interaction
  • c. anytime learning (reflection: Now with Web 2.0 and wireless Web access, anytime anywhere/ubiquitous learning becomes increasingly feasible) - requires self-discipline, motivation (being part of an online community), online facilitator to set the initial rules & standards
3. Facilitation
  • Community building - developing a conducive learning environment & encouraging shared construction of meaning (e.g., all each participant to create an online personality): a. clearly define the purpose of the group; b. create a distinctive gathering place for the group; c. promote effective leadership from within; d. define norms and a clear code of conduct; e. allow for a range of member roles; f. allow for and facilitate subgroups; g. allow members to resolve their own disputes
  • Knowledge generation - adhere to andragogical rather than pedagogical principles: use facilitative mode to create a student-directed environment
  • Process management - clear instructions (e.g., subdealines, online meeting times, number of posts required, presentation guidelines), virtual office hours, feedback
  • Roles of the online facilitator: teacher, mentor, manager, and coach
4. Assessment
  • A process of evaluating whether the online learning initiative has led to cost reduction, increased productivity, or a higher retention rate
  • Formative evaluation: an ongoing process that takes place throughout the delivery of the course in order to fill gaps, and clarify and adjust content and delivery mechanisms
  • Summative evaluation: evaluation that takes place after the course, most often in the form of grade. The frequency and quality of participation in the online interaction should be part of the grading basis.
  • Pre- & post-test/survey (Reflection: for EDTEC120 we used Profile-IT survey) and various smaller modules (individualized)

References:

Palloff, R., & Pratt, K. (1999). Building learning communities in cyberspace. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Thursday, September 3, 2009

Online learning 2: Pedagogical theories & instructional design

Pedagogical frameworks

1. Andragogic Model
  • let learners know why sth. is important to learn
  • assist learners to direct themselves through info
  • relate the topic to the learners' experiences
2. Objectivist Model (for short modules on specific concepts and skills)
  • the world is completely and correctly structured
  • intro-concept-example-practice-reflection (traditional textbook design)
3. Constructivist Model (for academically challenging longer modules and courses)
  • knowledge is contextual, meanings are rooted in the indexed by experience
  • problem-background-concept-analysis-solution (multidisciplinary, real-life problems)
4. Bloom's Taxonomy (Bloom, 1956)
  • Knowledge: list, define, tell, describe, identify, show, label, collect, examine, tabulate, quote, name, who, when, where, etc.
  • Comprehension: summarize, describe, interpret, contrast, predict, associate, distinguish, discuss, extend, etc.
  • Application: apply, demonstrate, complete, show, solve, examine, relate, change, classify, discover, etc.
  • Analysis: analyze, separate, order, explain, connect, classify, arrange, compare, select, explain, infer, etc.
  • Synthesis: combine integrate, modify, rearrange, substitute, plan, create, design, invent, what if?, compose, formulate, prepare, generalize, rewrite, etc.
  • Evaluation: assess, decide, rank, grade, test, measure, recommend, convince, select judge, explain, discriminate, support, conclude, compare, summarize, etc.
5. Problem-based learning (PBL)
  • a professional preparation strategy that uses multifaceted, cross-disciplinary problems as the starting point for learning
  • it draws on memory theory (activation of prior knowledge), problem solving theory (transfer concepts to new problems), and instance theory (pattern recognition)
Design and production of online content

1. Professional mode of production (e.g., for-profit online learning companies) - development team consists of SME (professor), advisory board, instructional designer - often takes 6 months
  • (1) Planning (time varies): faculty preparation, draft of a working curriculum, time line, budget, work plan
  • (2) Analysis and design (10 wks): curricular development, content analysis and initial design presentation
  • (3) Development (10 wks): product development, faculty input, alpha lockdown (each module), beta lockdown (entire course)
  • (4) Implementation (4 wks): implementation, evaluation, revisions and maintenance
2. Self-publication (web 2.0 is a catalyst?)

Wednesday, September 2, 2009

Online learning 1 - Adoption & implementation of innovations


Three challenges:

  • 1. Professionals from diverse academic backgrounds have little shared knowledge which causes major problems when planning & implementing online ed.
  • 2. Online instructors lack pedagogical background (e.g., constructivist approach, peer learning...)
  • 3. Voice of the clients (students) rarely heard

Diffusion of innovations (Rogers, 1995)

  • Why understand the innovation implementation process - 1. help understand why online learning initiatives succeed or fail; 2. how universities decide on policies that directly affect how instructors are required to deliver their courses
  • Diffusion: the process by which an innovation is communicated through certain channels over time among the members of a social system (Rogers, 1995)
  • Adopter (individual or organization) types: Innovators, Early Adopters, Early Majority, Late Majority, and Laggards.
  • Three types of innovation decisions: 1. Optional (problem: member vs. system); 2. Collective (problem: time-consuming, costly) ; 3. Authority (problem: online learning companies take advantage) - reflection: can web 2.0 change the landscape?
  • Disruptive technology (Christensen, 1997) - organizations are reluctant to venture into more risky but highly promising technologies (problem for web 2.0?)
  • Adoption stages: 1. knowledge; 2. persuasion; 3. decision; 4. implementation; 5. confirmation
  • Alternative of the change process (Fullan, 1991, p. 48): 1. initiation; 2. implementation; 3. continuation; 4. outcome
1. The initiation stage (intent): (1) selective perception; (2) attitudes forming (Contemplators, Adopters, & Rejectors); (3) adopter's sense of control; (4) teaching, administrative, and research aspects; (5) companies effect; (6) peer opinion & professional community; (7) administrative support

2. The implementation stage (overt change of behavior): (1) online learning represents a major shift of power (from instructors to instructional designers and learners, universities to corporate learning environments, f2f content to online, and now web 2.0 vs. commercial approach?); (2) non-research universities implement online learning faster (e.g., U. of Phoenix); (3) peer support & strong professional community; (4) business schools are always early adopters (because they stay close with the business front?)

3. The continuation stage (sustainability): (1) administrative support; (2) professional development; (3) facilitative educational methods

4. The outcome stage (assessment): (1) increased ability to apply what has been learned; (2) higher degree of satisfaction among educators and learners; (3) lower employee turnover; (4) the opportunity to cascade certain theories or methods down through the organization via online learning; (5) increased administrative efficiency

Reference:

Engvig, M. (2006). Online learning: All you need to know to facilitate and administer online courses. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovation dilemma. New York: Harper Business.

Fullan, M. G. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.

Wednesday, February 25, 2009

Frameworks for distance education research

1. Five options for DE
Map of Distance Education Technology Options (Adapted from McIsaac & Gunawardena, 1996).


2. Framework for DE research


Conceptual framework for studying distance education (Vrasidas & Zembylas, 2003)

3. Situated evaluation v quantitative approach?

Sunday, February 15, 2009

"Going global": The complexities of fostering intercultural understanding in a rural school using videoconferencing technology

Lee, M. M. (2004). "Going global": The complexities of fostering intercultural understanding in a rural school using videoconferencing technology. Unpublished dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington.

Chapter 1. Introduction
  • Emphasis on internationalization of curricula
    • social change
    • general goals (Tye, 2002): a. broadening students' horizons; b. building critical thinking skills; better preparing young people for productive lives in a nation that belongs to an increasingly interdependent world community
  • Problems
    • Access & opportunities (Kim, 2001)
    • Individualization v. universalization (Kim, 2001)
    • cultural consciousness (Banks, 1997)
  • Midwestern State, Henderson School & International Studies for Henderson State Schools (ISHS)
  • Framing the study (p. 5)
    • Intercultural Education (Cushner, 1998)
    • International studies (Merryfield, 2001)
    • Videoconferencing technology (Cuban, 1986; Reznich, 1997; Roberts et al., 1990; Yoakam, 1995; Tiedemann, 2002 - 4 benefits of videoconferencing: a. It is direct communication with experts to enhance understanding of a subject matter; b. it heightens interest which improves motivation and retention; c. it overcomes time and distance constraints; d. it improves the spontaneity of guests)
    • ISHS
    • Interaction as instructional strategy (Lee & Paulus, 2001; Moore, 1993; Vygotsky, 1978 - ZPD; Bonk, Oyer & Medury, 1995 - social constructivist; Garrison, 1993, p. 16 - interaction; Gilert & Moore, 1998 - interaction)
  • Significance of the study
    • No research to substantiate the impact of ISHS
    • Rurual school's isolation
    • The findings provide insight into the understanding of complexities associated with cross-cultural encounters; suggest possible implications of this type of program for educators who want to develop learning environments where the students can be empowered with a sense of intercultural competence as members of a multicultural society
  • Research questions
    • How does a middle school social studies teacher in a racially homogenous middle school integrate an international sutdies program into his World Geography curriculum?
    • How do the middle school students understand and interpret their encounters with people from other countries through interactive videoconferencing technology?
Chapter 2. The Design of the Study (p. 18) ( qualitative research - Lincoln & Cuba, 1985; Merriam, 1998; Wolcott, 1992)
  • Definition of Ethnography (Creswell, 1998; Tedlock, 2000; Chambers, 2000)
  • My stance as a critical theorist (Critical theory - Poskewitz, 1999a, p.2) - look at the program as either
    • an intervention, the effectiveness of which is assessed by measuring the change in students' perception about other cultures (attitudinal change), or
    • an opportunity to introduce the students to other cultures in order to see their reaction to such an opportunity (naturalistic ethnographic approach)
  • Methodological implications
    • ethnographic method is helpful in providing detailed info about participants & their surroundings
    • Individualized interaction techniques (building rapport)
  • The research design
    • Outline of the study
      • Phase 1: Search for possible locations using Henderson State demographic statistics and select 5 possible sites
      • Phase 2: Meet w/ Mr. G and obtain his agreement for the implementation of ISHS into his curriculum
      • Phase 3: Make observations and acclimate to the setting (continued until Phase 7)
      • Phase 4: Begin ISHS. Conduct sutdent/teacher interviews. Begin observation and engage in preliminary analysis
      • Phase 5: ISHS presenters' interviews (for causal feedback). Ongoing observation.
      • Phase 6: Transcription of data and search for emerging themes. Ongoing observation.
      • Phase 7: Data analysis. Ongoing observation. (themes from interviews were compared to the observation - basis for coding. Triangulation)
      • Phase 8: Further interviews w/ the students (questions drawn upon based on the preliminary analysis). Ongoing observation.
      • Phase 9: Analysis and write-up.
    • Research site
      • Selection criteria (purposive sampling): a. social studies class in rural high school; b. teacher agreement on using ISHS for entire school year; c. culturally isolated & racially homogeneous
      • Instructional characteristics of the Eliot School (school vision)
      • Technology use in the Eliot School
      • Participants (students, teachers)
  • Data collection
    • Observation (regualr classes without ISHS; class during the ISHS sessions; hallways & cafeteria; school functions such as athletic events; school area & nearby towns) ; to minimize the researcher's obtrusiveness (as an Asian) by regrulating her visits to the public areas of the school so that the students would become accustomed to her presence; examples of the observation data
    • Document analysis (textbook; class assignments)
    • Interviews (student, teacher)
  • Data anaylsis (p. 45)
    • Reconstructive analysis & diglogical data generation (emerging themes; check understandings with teachers & locals)
    • Coding (repeated reading of the data - preliminary analysis; topics compared across the data and grouped into emerging themes. Peer debriefing; discussion with the faculty)
    • Discovering system relations (findings compared w/ larger social context - Carspecken, 1996): Hermeneutic-reconstructive anlysis emphasizes action orientations such as interpretive schemes within a culture; systems analysis emphasizes action consequences and the distribution of action conditions broadly throughout society
      • The findings from the school site were compared w/ info about the neighborhood & the town (community)
      • The findings were compared to the dominant discourse of the period that sutdents were exposed to from media sources and conversation w/ others outside of the school
  • Possible limitations of the study
    • Focus group interviews w/ the students (group form may have inhibitory effects)
    • My role as researcher/participant (3-fold role - involvement in the implementation; worked as presenter; conducting the research process)
    • The novelty factor of the videoconferencing technology
    • Myself as an international student (Hawthorne effect)
Chapter 3. "Bringing the world into the classroom": The ISHS program in session (p. 50)
  • Sections
  • Discussion
    • Emphasis on interaction
    • "Personalized narratives
    • Uses of other technologies
    • Presenter's characteristics
  • Other instructional interventions for intercultural awareness
    • Career talk with the ISHS outreach coordinator
    • Ms. Hilary's diversity program
Chapter 4. "Making it relevant": The teacher's use of the ISHS program (p. 82)
  • The teacher's personal values and views on education
    • Being a coach vs. being a teacher
    • Being tolerant vs. having strong moral convictions
  • 'No Child Left Behind' & issues of parental responsibilities
  • On instructional strategies
    • Increasing student motivation
    • Student-center pedagogy
    • Bringing in current affairs
  • "Making relevant": Integrating ISHS into the curriculum
  • The future use of ISHS (p. 101)
  • Discussion
    • ISHS as a "live" resource
    • Understanding Mr. Gordon's identity
Chapter 5. "Meeting the real person": The students' interpretation of the ISHS program (p. 105)
  • Students' interpretation of the "other": Constructing difference in school (Identity - Mead, 1934; Habermas, 1981; Kanpol & McLauren, 1995, Hall, 1996; Taylor, 1994; Schutz, 1970; Sleeter & Grant, 1991; Hall & du Gay, 1996)
    • Groups & labels (social class variations - Brantlinger, 1993) - being popular
    • Homosexuality (Allport, 1979, p. 87 - well-deserved reputation theory)
    • "Being popular": Power & legitimacy (Allport, 1979; Kanpol & McLaren, 1995)
    • Racism
  • Difference & the ISHS videoconferencing programs (Self-Other relations - Fine, 1994)
    • Interest in the exotic (Ashcroft et al., 2000, p. 94)
    • Americanized cultural forms & U.S.-centrism
    • "Coming from a real person": Authenticity & group essentialism
    • Differentiating vs. "othering"
  • Discussion
    • Popularity & racism: The discourse of exclusion (Sarup, 1996, p. 59)
    • Making sense of the difference (Cushner, 2003 - difference as diviation generates the sense of fear)
    • Oversimplification of other cultures
  • Possible reasons for the interpretation (p. 139)
    • Culture-specific approach to understanding other cultures (Cushner, 2003, p. 42)
    • Emphasis on ethnicism or "national character" (internally homogenous - Brah, 1997, p. 129)
    • View of culture as static (Kanpol & McLaren, 1995)
Chapter 6. Conclusions & implications for future research (p. 142)
  • Tentative conclusion
    • Positive response to ISHS
    • resulted in interpretations of culture emphasizing the exotic in some cases and in the search for Americanization in others
    • didn't result in an awareness of, or challenge to, an already established framework for understanding differences
  • Future implications
    • Providing a support system for the teacher
      • understanding how differnce is constructed
      • community of practice for social studies teachers (Wenger, 1998)
    • Implications for instructional design issues (Merryfield, 2001)
      • continuous implementation of ISHS
      • collaborative problem solving approach
      • teaching tolerance: providing instructional resources
      • collaboration between rural schools and universities
      • providing a panel of speakers
    • Administrative support for the ISHS program from the university
      • creating more tangible incentive for the presenters
      • creating additional partnership
    • For further research
      • further conceptualization of differences for particular contexts and learners
      • issues on curriculum design in social studies
      • teacher education for social studies
      • politics of international education
References

Appendix
  • Sample interview protocol for students
  • Sample interview protocol for teacher
  • Pre-survey questions for students
  • Reflection of the session (students)
  • Summary of events
  • Sample of preliminary analysis

Thursday, February 12, 2009

Globalization & Emerging Technologies

Interrelationships between globalization & DE (p. 649)
  • "Globalization implies that most people, if not all, are connected more or less contemporaneously with distant events, sometimes whether they like it or not. This 'time-space compression (Giddens, 1994, p.7) is not just limited to communications and transport, but also to economic activity. The social and cultural implications...are intimately connected." (Evans, 1997, p. 18)
  • The human experience is altering fundamentally within a globalizing world because of: a. the speed and interactivity of new communications media; b. the fusion of cultural conditions
The tensions between globalization and the ways of living and learning



3 generations of DE technologies (p. 652)
  1. "Correspondence Ed."
  2. Aduiovisual media (radio & TV)
  3. Computer-based communications technologies

Reference
Evans, T., & Nation, D. (2007). Globalization and emerging technologies. In M. G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education (2nd ed., pp. 649-659). Mahwah, NJ. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Friday, October 24, 2008

3 Ways Web-Based Computing Will Change Colleges

3 Ways Web-Based Computing Will Change Colleges

Cloud computing, one of the latest technology buzzwords, is so hard to explain that Google drove a bus from campus to campus to walk students through the company’s vision of it.

After students sat through a demo at computers set up nearby, they boarded the bus and got free T-shirts. The bus only stopped at colleges that had already agreed to hand over their student e-mail service to Google, which offers to run it for colleges free (Microsoft has a similar service and made a similar road trip).

At first I wondered why Google needed to demonstrate its popular e-mail service. Didn’t students already know how to click send? But when I hopped on the bus at George Washington University last month, I saw that the demos highlighted all the other Web services in its Google Apps for Education e-mail package for colleges, which includes a Web-based word processor called Google Docs, a Web-based spreadsheet program, and other tools.

Those tools are the cloud computing part—the term usually refers to programs that run over the Internet rather than locally on a user’s computer. And Google officials explained that many students don’t yet know about those new Web-based services.

Google’s bus is just one of many signs that cloud computing is starting to shake up campus technology. In the next five years, Web-based computing will likely bring important changes in how students study, how scholars do research, and how college information-technology departments operate.

Here are the promises and the challenges:

Sharing From Everywhere

At a summer program at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology that I sat in on last year, I asked students whether they had stayed up all night at the library finishing their final group projects, as the program’s organizers had predicted. One of the students looked at me as if I were crazy. Yes, he had worked late—until about 3 a.m.—but he had been at home by himself. The students all contributed to a shared document using Google Docs, which anyone in the group could edit online from anywhere. All of the students were essentially logged in to the same computer (in this case off at Google somewhere), one adding a paragraph at the end, another changing the font, and another rewriting the title. There was no longer any need to worry about getting everyone in the same room at the same time.

Such virtual collaboration is a key benefit of running something like a word processor on the Internet instead of on an isolated PC. Students can easily ask parents or faraway friends to edit their term papers remotely without having to send clunky attachments. Or students can set up a shared online document or spreadsheet to plan the next big fraternity bash. And that’s what is already happening at many institutions.

For professors, having documents stored in the Internet cloud means they can easily move from their home offices to their university office to the classroom without worrying about leaving the latest copy of their lecture notes behind. They can just log into Google Docs, or Microsoft’s Office Live or some other networked service, from any location. And the cloud-computing tools make it easier for professors to collaborate with colleagues on scholarly papers, too, supporting the trend of interdisciplinary research.

Supercharging Research

Google and other companies may be the innovators in cloud computing for things like word processing, but colleges have been leaders in using cloud computing for research.

Specifically, many colleges are setting up systems that let professors tap into supercomputers over the Internet using a standard PC. Then there’s a closely related trend of grid computing, which allows colleges to string together normal computers working in tandem over the Internet to provide the equivalent firepower of a supercomputer. The cobbled-together approach has meant that small colleges that could never afford a room-size supercomputer can set up something with the same processing bang on the cheap.

Basically, cloud computing is bringing supercomputing to the mainstream of research. “You reduce the barrier to use advanced computing facilities,” says Craig A. Stewart, associate dean for research technologies at Indiana University. (He will be co-moderating a panel about the promise of cloud computing at this week’s annual conference of Educause, the higher-education technology group.) And that ease of use means historians will increasingly join climate experts in using supercomputers to tackle their problems, he predicts.

Reshaping IT Departments

Cloud computing is also leading colleges to band together to offer services. After all, because servers that run Web-based software can be anywhere, why not get together with a few other colleges to build a joint data center?

That is already happening in Virginia, where a consortium of more than a dozen colleges is building the Virginia Virtual Computing Lab. The system will let students or professors at the different institutions use their own computers to access specialized software, such as 3-D modeling programs. The idea is to bring the kind of programs usually found in college computer labs right to students wherever they are, and one day it might make old-fashioned computer labs obsolete.

The Virginia project is modeled on a system already up and running at North Carolina State University, and that virtual lab is being shared with two community colleges and the University of North Carolina system.

“Students can’t really tell where it is since they’re going over the Internet,” says Henry E. Schaffer, coordinator of special IT projects and faculty collaboration at North Carolina State. “With a normal broadband connection, it just works.”

Meanwhile, colleges will outsource some services that it makes more sense for a big consumer company to handle, like e-mail, saving the colleges money to go build the services that they can do better.

The Challenges

That’s the rosy vision, but there are downsides.

The main one is privacy. Storing all your research notes on Google’s servers, for instance, may make the contents easier for government agencies or others to subpoena than if the data were on personal computers, because of the inconsistencies in current law, according to Daniel J. Solove, a law professor at George Washington University who explores the issue in his book, The Digital Person: Technology and Privacy in the Information Age. Companies like Google may be tempted to mine that data down the road and sell it to advertisers, especially if those companies fall on hard times, he said in a recent interview. “I think we need better laws for data security,” he said. “It is a problem that has not yet been solved.”

Also, there are human obstacles to collaborations like Virginia’s virtual computer lab, so just because such projects make good sense doesn’t mean that colleges will be able to pull them off if partners have conflicting ideas of how they should operate.

A new book by Educause that is scheduled to be released this week at the group’s annual conference captures the mix of promise and confusion that cloud computing poses today. Called, The Tower and the Cloud: Higher Education in the Age of Cloud Computing, it offers more than a dozen essays with predictions about the next stage of computing on campus. The book’s introduction argues that a cloud is an apt metaphor for the shift ahead: Clouds get harder to see your way through as you walk into them.

“We are letting go of a known and trusted toehold,” the book contends, “in favor of an uncertain one.”

Thursday, October 25, 2007

Integrating intercultural online learning experiences into the computer classroom

St. Amant, K. (2002). Integrating intercultural online learning experiences into the computer classroom. Technical Communication Quarterly, 11 (3), 289-315.

"Technical communicators of the new millennium will need to develop certain skills to succeed in international online interactions (IOIs), and computer classrooms with online access can help students to develop these skills through direct interaction with materials and individuals from other cultures. This article presents exercises instructors can use to help students develop these particular skills."

Sunday, October 14, 2007

Complexities in the evaluation of distance education and virtual schooling

Vrasidas, C., Zembylas, M, & Chamberlain, R. (2003). Complexities in the evaluation of distance education and virtual schooling. Educational Media International, 40 (3/4), 201-208.

This paper discusses the complexities and issues involved in the evaluation of distance education and virtual schooling. In order to provide an anchor to the issues involved in evaluating online projects, the authors first present the evaluation design of a virtual high school project. Then the emphasis of the paper is on the goals of the evaluation, stakeholder analysis, eevaluator role, data collection, and data analysis. Finally the authors discuss the need for evaluation of distance education and the ethical responsibility of the evaluators involved.

Major project idea?

Still struggling with ideas for EDTEC770 major project (for which I would like to do an evaluation/comparative study for international distance education programs)...

Well, here is where I am:

1. Last year, my colleagues and I did a research on learner perceptions of interaction in the Global Media Network. What we did was a pilot study that examines the learner-learner, learner-instructor, learner-content, and learner-media interaction. We conducted an online survey which resulted in 16 respondents, with 7 from a BSU-located GMN classroom and 9 from their Taiwanese counterparts. It was a fairly small sample size but it was not too bad for a pilot study. The survey consisted of 6 parts: 1. Demographic, 2. Learning Style, 3. Interaction Frequency, 4. Interaction Depth, 5. Satisfaction, and 6. Open-Ended Questions. Likert Scale was applied to all questions except those in Part 1 and Part 6. The reliablity statistics showed our 21-item instrument is reliable (Cronbach's Alpha=.879) and can be distributed to a large sample in the future study. Based on the findings, we suggested that the GMN participants preferred interaction with the classmates and media and they might want to see some improvement in their interaction with the instructors and course content. In addition, findings of group comparison (American VS Taiwanese cross-tab) provided some clue for further study on cross-cultural difference and international collaborative learning in the distance learning environment.


2. For my EDTEC699 class, I planned to develop another evaluation study proposal on the GMN. However, this time the focus is on the faculty and staff perceptions rather than the learners. A possible title for this study might be - Instructional Needs and Technology Support in International Distance Education: A Qualitative Study of Faculty and Technology Staff Perceptions. Professional development and technology support are essential for faculty to successfully develop distance education program. Over the past several years, as the numbers of courses offered through the GMN system has increased, so has the discussion among university faculty regarding the technology support in this environment. Among those discussed issues, what interest me most are the GMN faculty perceptions on their demand for training opportunities and the actual technology assistance they receive, and how such perceptions compare to those from the technology staff involved. In an effort to identify the possible discrepancies between the needs and the actual support which might have an essential impact on the distance course development, I would like to investigate the above-mentioned issues through qualitative methods (e.g., interview, observation, etc.).

3. For EDTEC770 class, I originally planned to do a cross-cultural study on the GMN. However, I found it extremely difficult when cross-cultural issues add to the depth and magnitude of complexities in evaluation. I can still use the methodology from my first study and run some stats to test the difference but I don't know if that is a good idea or not. I really need some help.

P.S.
Lee, C., Clausen, J., & Ma, W. (2007). Learner perceptions of interaction in the Global Media Network. In C. Crawford et al. (Eds.). Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2007, 1800-1806.

Abstract:
Interaction has critical impacts on the effectiveness of distance learning. To understand interaction based on learners' perceptions can assist learner-oriented learning, as well as enhance the instructional design. This paper focuses on the online interaction perceived by the learners in the Global Media Network (GMN) project, an international synchronous distance learning environment initiated in 2005 at Ball State University, Indiana. The primary data collection method is an online survey which focuses on four types of online interaction. The findings reveal the learning preferences and perspectives of the GMN participants toward different types of online interaction, which could be used for further improvement of the GMN course development. Because of the small sample size in this study, further study should include a much larger number of participants.